Linac96

30 YEARS OPERATION OF 25 MeV PROTON LINAC I-2 IN ITEP

AT BEAM CURRENT OF 200-230 mA

N.V.Lazarev, V.A.Andreev, V.S.Artemov, V.A.Batalin, I.V.Chuvilo, V.I.Edemsky, A.A.Kolomiets, B.K.Kondratiev, Yu.N.Kus'min, R.P.Kouibida, V.K.Plotnikov, N.I.Porubai, A.M.Raskopin, N.I.Rybakov, V.S.Skachkov, Yu.B.Stasevich, V.S.Stolbunov, R.M.Vengrov

117259, ITEP, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The first in Russia strong-focusing 25 MeV proton linac-injector I-2, computations, design and construction of which have been carried out under the guidance of Prof. I.M.Kapchinsky, will celebrate this autumn its 30-th anniversary. Output current of the beam at energy of 25 MeV year after year is 200-230 mA, down time is less than 0.5% of schedule time of about 5000 hour/year. Launched a decade before RFQ epoch coming the linac I-2 is the "living witness" of its physical project adequation to requirements of beam dynamics and adhere to assigned stringent tolerances that determines so long machine life.

Introduction

The first in Russia strong-focusing 25 MeV proton linac I-2 was launched on November 1966. Its physical ground, design and construction were implemented by ITEP Linac Division under the direct leadership of Prof. I.M.Kapchinsky [1-4].

The purpose of the 25 MeV machine construction was to serve as an injector of the ITEP proton synchrotron (PS) and to be as a prototype of an 100 MeV injector for 70 GeV IHEP PS developed only 1 year later. The main contribution in the linac I-2 project and its implementation besides ITEP was done MRTI being the principal technology designer of RF cavities, RF supply system, RF tuning procedures, mechanics, cooling etc. and Efremov Institute (NIIEPA) which was responsible for preinjector, design of drift tubes and their dc supply. The project was performed under the general supervision of academician A.L.Mintz (MRTI) and vice-academician V.V.Vladimirsky (ITEP).

All principle decisions were carefully tested on the models and prototypes. The choice of optimum poles contour of drift tube quadrupole lenses ensures absence the sixth harmonic of the field and comparative simplicity of their manufacturing [ 5,6].

Very soon after the start-up the project beam current of 130 mA was achieved [7]. Beginning from 1967 till today linac I-2, being Injector the 2nd after the first 4 MV Van-de-Graaf, have continuously operated day by day delivering to PS through HEBT accelerated beam current of about 200 mA during 4500-5500 hours per each year in average [8,9].

Accurate accordance of physical I-2 project to beam dynamics requirements and its strong adhere to assigned tolerances defined the long life of the machine developed before RFQ epoch coming.

The main features of the linac design and some unusual technical decisions of its technology systems are presented.

Characteristic Features

The linac I-2 has two 148.5 MHz resonators (on 0.7-6 and 6-24.6 MeV) with 20 and 35 drift tubes containing in pairs high-current quadrupoles of opposite signs forming FOD and FOFDOD types of focusing periods. The acceleration period in the first cavity is 2; it simplified the quadrupole arrangement in tight volume of drift tubes. Note, that different acceleration periods in cavities strongly impeded later an acceleration of other ion types.

The r.m.s. error of drift tubes initial alignment is about 35 m in transversal plane and <0.02% of the accelerating period length in the axial direction.

Drift tubes were adjusted by special alignment units on hard girders which are supported on a special long foundation that had ensured the stable conditions in spite of happened dismantle (by explosion) of one of neighbouring building and erection of the other one. The use of the developed drift tube alignment method [10] which ensure to check its positions without opening of resonators approved a good many years stability of the accelerating-focusing channel.

Both cavities of 1.37 m are housed in stainless steel tanks of 1.8 m and length of 18.4 m. At first we used 7 high throughput (8000 l/s each) oil pumps with liquid nitrogen traps and in spite of good vacuum of 3-510-7 mm Hg rather often we suffered difficulties at RF power feeding after schedule shut-downs. The transition to 40 titanium discharge 250 l/s pumps (without of traps) ensured the working vacuum on the level of about 2-510-6 mm Hg, but excluded almost completely multipactoring or breakdown in cavities. At this transition we replaced the ordinary gas supply system of duoplasmatron ion source by original one with exhaust valve decreasing the gas flow from 600-800 to 10 cm3/h [11].

Note, that our cavities and vacuum tank after their closing in 1966 were never opened any more. After beginning operation with filament cathode we are using the cold cathode in duoplasmatron type ion source. Mo and Cu cold cathodes ensure their unusual long service from several weeks to more than one year [12]. The full output current is 1200-1500 mA at pulse duration up to 30 s and average repetition rate to 1 pps. The proton component constitutes as much as 80-85%. Technological systems upgrade and matching channel redesign resulted the extreme high pulse proton current of 230 mA in 1977 year [11].

In 1984 helium ion beam current up to 300 mA has been obtained from duoplasmatron with cold cathode [13]. In checking runs He2+ ions have been accelerated to full energy at beam current about 2 mA [14,15]. Today the cold cathode duoplasmatron ion source with cooling upgrade is tested in CW mode at proton beam current of 10-12 mA.

The injection energy of 703 keV is adjusted by stabilized 40 kV modulator exciting the IT-800 pulse transformer that generates 700-750 kV semisinusoidal 1 ms pulses [16] with proton injection on the top of each one.

At accelerator modernization the matching channel aperture was increased up to 90 mm, thus restriction of transversal beam sizes occurred in the section between buncher and the first drift tube with aperture diameters of 40 mm and 20 mm, respectively. The matching channel structure simplification was achieved by using long-focusing optics properties of the accelerating column. The beam current of 420 mA at maximum phase density of 1200-1500 mA/cmmrad is transported to the first drift tube [17]. The output beam emittance measurement showed the beam of 100 mA and more occupied always the whole channel acceptance of 1.2 cmmrad. So, marginal value of normalized emittance for 100% particles increased in the linac channel from 0.4 cmmrad on the input of the first drift tube to 1.2 cmmrad at the output of the machine [18,19].

Numerous original methods and tools were developed during experimental beam dynamics investigation [20] on the linac: parametric resonance study [21], method of fixed tuning spectrometer for longitudinal oscillations frequency measurement [22], period switching-off method for transverse oscillations observation [23] etc. The set of apparatus was developed for emittance measurement at the input and output of the accelerator [24], as well as for accelerated beam RF structure observation [25].

The most noticeable failures happened during 3 decade were as follows:

penetration of oil vapors in cavities at sudden losses of ac supply line; very slow and long time RF voltage increasing is required for burning down of that vapors;

two destructive breakdowns of 750 kV winding isolation of HV pulse transformer; the last version of the coil has operated without failure since 1975;

production stoppage of output power tubes GI-4A aroused a modernization of whole RF supply system based now on more powerful tubes GI-27A [26];

failure of the last quadrupole in the matching channel placed into vacuum tank on the first cavity outer wall.

This failure threatened to a whole dismantle of the linac structure and very long shut-down of its operation. The output linac current with mismatched LEBT channel decreased to 60-65 mA that was not enough for normal injection in PS.

In order to avoid the opening up of the tank with old solidified rubber seal we insert along the axis into 40 mm aperture of the spoiled lens a small REC quadrupole developed in ITEP [27] with right adjusted gradient and polarity but having an inner diameter only 20 mm. It was the most simple solution. It seems to be the first experience of unclosed REC quadrupole operation in high vacuum volume of linac nearby to the proton beam [28]. Thus we restored required matching conditions and now only some more careful adjustment of the transportation through LEBT is necessary to obtain the former output beam current of 230 mA.

The output HEBT system [29,30] consists of 3 lines provided with pulse bending magnets and set of quadrupole doublets and triplets. It forms injection line with debuncher, measuring line with dc analyzing magnet and line for physical and chemical experiments, short-live radionuclide production [31] and radiation tests at 6 or 24.6 MeV (or in the air after output foil on 2 MeV less) at average proton beam current of 2 A [32,33].

Conclusion

The linac I-2 is the very old working machine deprived modern computerized diagnostics and control apparatus but as a matter of fact due to the greatest in the world output pulse current and other good physical parameters of the beam it may be a retentive memory to the first author of the project Prof. I.M.Kapchinsky, who published a lot of papers and 4 books [34-37] devoted to analysis of the methods for obtaining high intensity ion beams. The books have played in the world the significant role in development of the ion linacs fundamental theory and engineering practice with beam currents in vicinity of the Coulomb limits.

During a time of design, construction and upgrades of the linac it has been proposed numerous inventions on original physical methods and technical solutions (partly described in the papers below) introduced in acceleration practice. They defined a good operation and reliability of the machine. Results obtained at the linac I-2 development, launching and high beam current experiments were used on the similar stages in the following strong-focusing machines in Russia.

References

[1] V.A.Batalin, I.M.Kapchinsky et al. "The start-up of Strong-Focusing 25 MeV Proton Linac I-2". "Atomnaya Energiya", Vol.22, issue 3, p239 (1967).

[2] I.M.Kapchinsky, B.P.Murin et al. Set of 11 papers (of 45 authors), devoted to design and construction of the Linac I-2 in special issue of magazine "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No5, p9-70 (1967).

[3] I.M.Kapchinsky, V.G.Kulman et al. "Adjustment of Accelerating Conditions and Beam Parameters of I-2 Linear Accelerator." Proc. of the 6-th Int. Conf. on High Energy Acc., CEAL-2000, Cambridge, Mass., pA1 (1967).

[4] I.M.Kapchinsky,V.G.Kulman et al. "25-MeV Proton Linac", ibid., pA30.

[5] I.M.Kapchinsky and V.K.Plotnikov. "Quadrupole Magnetic Lenses for Drift Tube Linac .Part 1.Requirements to Lenses and Pole Tips Shape Choice". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No3, p15 (1963).

[6] E.N.Daniltsev and V.K.Plotnikov. "Quadrupole Magnetic Lenses for Drift Tube Linac.Part 2.Nonlinear Field Measurement of Plane Pole Tips". ibid. p20.

[7] V.A.Batalin, I.M.Kapchinsky and V.K.Plotnikov. "Experimental Study of Proton Beam Dynamics in Strong-Focusing Linac". Preprint ITEP-617, Moscow (1968).

[8] I.M.Kapchinsky, V.K.Plotnikov et al. "Increasing of the Beam Intensity in the ITEP Proton Synchrotron Injector". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No5, p17 (1972).

[9] V.A.Batalin, I.M.Kapchinsky et al. "Beam Intensity Increasing in a Proton Linac". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No1, p15 (1973).

[10] E.N.Daniltsev and N.I.Porubai. "The Checking up of the Drift Tubes Linac I-2 Alignment". Preprint ITEP-16, Moscow (1975).

[11] V.A.Batalin, A.A.Kolomiets et al. "Ion Source with Exhaust Output Valve". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No3, p35 (1978).

[12] V.A.Batalin, A.A.Kolomiets et al. "Cold Cathode Duoplazmatron for Proton Linac Injector". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No2, p21 (1973).

[13] V.A.Batalin, I.M.Kapchinsky et al. "Cold Cathode Duoplasmatron Investigation for Production of Helium Ions". "Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Techniki", Ser.: Technika Fizicheskogo Eksperimenta, Vol.1(22), Moscow, p48 (1985).

[14] V.A.Batalin, V.V.Kushin et al. "He2+ Acceleration on the Proton Linac I-2 to the Energy of 24 MeV/nucleus". "Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Techniki", Ser.: Technika Fizicheskogo Eksperimenta, Vol.4(35), Moscow, p1 (1987).

[15] I.M.Kapchinsky, R.A.Romanovsky and V.S.Stolbunov. "Experimental Study of the Ion Helium Beam Dynamics on the Linac I-2". Preprint ITEP-166, Moscow (1988).

[16] A.M.Kozodaev and N.V.Lazarev. "High Voltage Stabilized Thiristor Modulator". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No4, p92 (1970).

[17] V.A.Batalin, V.S.Stolbunov et al. "Beam Quality Improvement at the Input of I-2 Linac". "Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Techniki", Ser.: Technika Fizicheskogo Eksperimenta, Vol.2(28), Moscow, p3 (1986).

[18] I.M.Kapchinsky and R.P.Kouibida. "To the Question of the Proton Beam Phase Volume Expansion in a Linac". Proc. of the All-Union Conf. on Charged Particle Accelerators, Vol.1, Dubna, p256-9 (1979).

[19] R.P.Kouibida, A.V.Kryzhanovsky and N.V.Lazarev. "On Proton Beam Emittance Growth in Linac". Proc. of the 1981 LAC, Los Alamos, LA-9234, p142.

[20] R.A.Romanovsky and V.S.Stolbunov. "Beam Dynamics Experimental Investigation and Method of Optimal Tuning of Proton Linac I-2". "Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Techniki", Ser.: Technika Fizicheskogo Eksperimenta, Vol.3(34), Moscow, p30 (1987).

[21] V.A.Batalin, A.A.Kolomiets and R.P.Kouibida. "Proton Linac Parametric Resonance". Preprint ITEP-87, Moscow (1975).

[22] V.A.Batalin, A.A.Kolomiets and R.P.Kouibida. "Study of the Acceleration Regime in Ion Linacs by Fixed Adjustment Spectrometer". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No2, p16 (1971).

[23] V.A.Batalin and A.A.Kolomiets. "Sensitivity of Switching-off Period Method in Strong-Focusing Linac Channels". "Pribori i Tehnika Eksperimenta" No3, p37 (1970).

[24] R.P.Kouibida and V.S.Stolbunov. "Apparatus for the Beam Emittance Measurement at Input and Output of the Linac I-2". Preprint ITEP-171, Moscow (1984).

[25] R.PKouibida, R.A.Romanovsky and V.S.Stolbunov. "On the Observation Technique of the Linac I-2 Proton Beam RF Structure". "Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Techniki", Ser.: Technika Fizicheskogo Eksperimenta, Vol.3(9), Moscow, p46 (1981).

[26] I.M.Kapchinsky, N.V.Lazarev et al. "Upgrade of the Proton Linac I-2". Proc of the 4-th All-Union Conf. on Acc. Vol.1, Moscow, p167 (1975).

[27] I.M.Kapchinsky, V.S.Skachkov et al. "Drift Tubes for a Focusing Channel of Ion Linear Accelerator". Proc. of the 1989 PAC, IEEE, Vol.2, Chicago, p1073 (1989).

[28] I.M.Kapchinsky, V.S.Skachkov et al. "Experience of REC Using in Linac I-2". Proc. of the 9-th All-Union Acc. Conf., Vol.2, p57 (1985).

[29] I.M.Kapchinsky, N.V.Lazarev et al. "Experience of the Injector I-2 Operation on Three Channels for Beam Extraction". "Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Techniki", Ser.: Linear Accelerators, Vol.2(3), Kharkov, p (1976).

[30] A.M.Kozodaev, N.V.Lazarev et al. "Pulse Magnetic Commutation of the Linac I-2 Beam". "Voprosy Atomnoi Nauki i Techniki", Ser.: Linear Accelerators, Vol.2(3), Kharkov, p (1976).

[31] I.V.Chuvilo, L.L.Goldin et al. "Ultra-Short Medicine Radionuclides Production". Proc. of the 9-th All-Union Acc. Conf., Vol.2, p57 (1985).

[32] I.M.Kapchinsky, V.A.Batalin et al. "Use of the Linac I-2 for Applied Research". Proc. of the All-Union Conf. on Using Acc. in Industry, Leningrad, Vol.1, p249 (1976).

[33] V.I.Bobylev, A.M.Kozodaev et al. "Operation of the Linac I-2 on Several Users". IEEE Trans. NS-26, No1, p1549 (1979).

[34] I.M.Kapchinsky. "Beam Dynamics in Linear Resonance Accelerators ". Atomizdat, Moscow (1966).

[35] I.M.Kapchinsky. "Theory of Linear Resonance Accelerators". Energoizdat, Moscow (1982).

[36] I.M.Kapchinsky. "Theory of Resonance Linear Accelerators". Harwood Academic Publishers, ISSN 0272-5088 (1985).

[37] I.M.Kapchinsky. "Selected Topics in Linac Theory". LA-UR-93-4192, Los Alamos (1993).